Regarding Gallipoli, World War 1

REGARDING GALLIPOLI, TURKEY, World War 1:

​

Yes, Australian troops (ANZAC's) were sent to the incorrect place for the "landing" at Gallipoli.

​

United States of America military (those involved) researched the coastline of Turkey and chose a particularly bad place for the Australian troops (ANZAC's) to be sent, then settled on coordinates for the place. They usually say around 4 miles off course, compared to the original place chosen. The United State of America (particularly what is now its Air Force) then contacted its enemy Turkey's military beforehand. They explained they were going to try to give Australian troops (ANZAC's) incorrect coordinates, told the Turkish military where the chosen place was going to be, told them to set up their weapons to be ready, then asked them to also set up to take film and still photographs of the landing, so the USA could keep the images as "souvenirs". They then had members of the French military deliberately send incorrect coordinates to the Australian troops (ANZAC's) for the landing. 

​

A blatant war crime against Australians (ANZAC's) that they both (France, USA) carry on about incessantly, along with lunatics from Turkey. The three are like an "axis of evil", incessantly committing further crimes in the same method, like robotic racists. They have a particular focus on the crime against Australian troops (ANZAC's) because if people argue about it, or get caught up in their rubbish, it distracts people to focus on one country (Australia), that causes people to be less likely to realize that the same method was used to do the same crime against troops from multiple countries that were supposed to have the United Stated of America as an "ally".

​

Turkey agreed to do it for their enemy at the time, the USA, with full collusion. The most pathetic excuse for reasoning for that decision I have ever been aware of is that those responsible from Turkey decided to conspire with it's enemy the USA and do it for them when asked to because they were already aware that "Mohammad (Muslim religion) was part Australian" specifically part Gippslander. See lunatics involved in sport here for the rest. Disturbed at best, insanity.

 

That method by the USA and France was used to send incorrect coordinates for more difficult landing zones than originally selected on dozens of occasions during World War 1 and World War 2, amongst other conflicts, to multiple "allied forces" from multiple countries. They openly discuss it out loud when touring the world committing metaphor copy crimes. A French lunatic trailing along beside a psychotic retard from the USA can often be seen and obviously heard chatting about it on the way out of events like a sports event they have corruptly interfered with, where they chat about the original incident like was "choosing some light genocide entertainment, then a spot of lunch with the French to check out the photographs", on the way out of a sports event where the result was blatantly wrong (for example). It is so retardedly openly discussed that they can be easily recorded talking about it on the way out with a mobile phone.

​

The USA also offered to supply the Turkish Army with film and still cameras to record the crime with. They sent them ahead for the army of Turkey to use. State of the art, USA. Ironically enough, they neglected to tell the Turkish Army to cover the cameras when they were using them, so any markings on them including branding and country of origin of the manufacturer, could not be seen. They didn't think of it themselves. They just didn't think it would be an issue, I guess. When Australian troops took a look through magnifying equipment (like binoculars and small telescopes), at the Turkish Army filming the troops,  the cameras had branding plastered all over them. Very shiny, some in silver, and bizarrely obvious. Similar to  "Made in the U.S.A". "Official Camera of the Military of the United States of America", and North American brand names, surprisingly enough. They were really the official cameras of the military of the United states of America.

​

All three have an incessant habit of choosing bits of coastline (etcetera) that match the bit in Turkey WW1 to set up organized crime and terrorism bases. There is always some moron pretending to be a member of the French military sending incorrect co-ordinates to Australian troops (ANZAC's) via WW1 means 24-7 in a uniform costume somewhere.

​

After heavy losses, there was a change of plan to attempt to facilitate a safer landing by on site ANZAC command. The decision was made to upturn landing boats when they were not being scanned by searchlight in the shallower water, then pretend they were boats that failed to make it to shore drifting along the coastline to a more suitable place to get ashore, no matter how many trips it took to do it. Always trying to repeat the same pattern along the shore with troops underneath holding the boats up with whatever they could. Loose troops caught on and suddenly popped up from under the overturned boats for some air, to try to get to shore as well. Including the odd surprise Armenian soldier trying to get away from the Turkish Army.

​

The USA ended up with bulk photographs of Australian military personnel (ANZAC's) on shore away from the chosen crime site, soaked wet from the nipples down due to wading ashore underneath the landing boats, amongst others. All taken with special telescopic cameras by Turkish soldiers. I'm sure the USA Air Force (and many other lunatics) still have copies of every miserable photo. They clutch them in their hands in shifts 24-7. After whoever was involved in the crime against the ANZAC's analysed things, they decided that the least they could do was pretend all the wet soldiers were soaked because they pissed themselves in fear of the chosen landing site on the way in. To "compensate" themselves for not getting more of the gruesome images of heavy losses incurred at the original (incorrect) landing site. The Turkish military just kept on snapping photographs of the Australians (ANZACS's) for months, if not the whole time until evacuation. Lunatics from the USA now claim it is tradition to try to make Australians lose bladder control and piss in the pants in public. It is incessant, possibly 24-7 in shifts like a satellite game show.

​

If some crime is being organized, lunatics from Turkey are the first people to volunteer to travel to Australia and film it or take photographs for whoever is involved, particularly if it has a USA---France theme. The phase out and pretend "it doesn't matter  what the crime is, really, they are only filming it". Even if it is in the same room as something heinous. They have filmed many, many a corruptly ruined footy match here over the decades. Vulgarly involved as if "camouflage art".

​

My Great-Grand-Uncle General Sir John Monash ended up in a sexual relationship with a Homosexual part Turkish man after WW1, who was his sexual partner when he died in 1931. My direct family knew him well due to regular interaction with Sir John. My Grandmother Duchess and Lady Myrtle Webb the Habsburg was Sir John's next-of0kin when he died, as I mentioned.

​

There used to be a place called Soviet Armenia in the Soviet Union when it was run by my Grandfather Ioseb. I am a little part Armenian from my Russian ancestors. I am also biologically related (or related family of) every WW1 and WW2 Australian Army General (possibly without exception). Some of them were really females. The rubbish is incessant, along with the metaphor crimes. 

​

REGARDING WAR:

People who are descended from, or descended family of, people who actively participated in violent war are not in "hell".

Regardless of people who claim they aren't and are trying to make those people lives hell.

​

THE FRENCH FAKE “NICER”, BUT ACTUALLY NOT REALLY NICE THING:

​

This is a really difficult one. And not nice. After Gallipoli (through to the here and now) some French people invented one of the most bizarre routines about Australian (ANZAC) military personnel post-Gallipoli. A large percentage of the personnel who were evacuated from Gallipoli successfully were sent to be stationed elsewhere afterwards during World War 1. Including France itself. Personnel who left Gallipoli, in a lot of cases, lost their lives stationed elsewhere before the end of the war.

Some French people decided to “pretend” that a lot more Australian (ANZAC) personnel were evacuated from Gallipoli alive than is actually the reality of that situation. They decided to pretend the toll in Turkey was lower than the factual numbers, and that more personnel were evacuated and travelled to be stationed elsewhere than actually did. Then all died in a different country (not Turkey).

​

Those French people decided to pretend it was somehow a “nicer story” or more “poignant” to pretend those personnel were alive for longer than they were, before losing their lives elsewhere. Instead of being part of the factual much higher fatality numbers in Gallipoli (than some French people will quote if asked).

​

They transferred a percentage of the fatalities from Turkey to wherever Gallipoli stationed troops died elsewhere (including France), and sort of said to themselves in a deluded way “there, that’s a little bit nicer story for the friends and relatives”.

I have never found a way to describe their motivation for it, I don’t understand their mindset on it. They decided it was “less distressing”, or a somehow “nicer story” for all involved (regarding ANZACS), to pretend more personnel left Gallipoli than actually did, and then all lost their lives elsewhere shortly afterwards. As if pretending they lived longer than they did made it slightly less horrible for the grieving relatives and friends. It flowed through to memorials with names of deceased ANZACS on them, with the place of death incorrectly listed as post-Gallipoli, elsewhere. Instead of Turkey.

​

It must have been motivated by the deliberate incorrect coordinates from the French military thing. It was (is) really a deluded attempt to make those in the know who are French make themselves feel better about what happened, and have the deceased at Gallipoli ANZAC’s friends, family, and military, unknowingly play along and pretend it sounds a little bit nicer than the truth. I am assuming that some French people think it is nicer to pretend the ANZACs who died at Gallipoli, that they pretend were evacuated and died elsewhere, died elsewhere in a fairer combat scenario. Instead of what was basically a pre-planned ambush war crime like scenario against the ANZAC’s in Turkey.

​

It's not nice, or nicer is all I can think of to say.

​

Then there is the verbal tactic element, that is unavoidable in life. It usually starts with someone bringing up Australian (ANZAC) fatalities at Gallipoli, Turkey. Then someone usually mentions that personnel evacuated form Gallipoli went on to serve in the military stationed elsewhere (like France and Egypt). Then someone gets around to who died elsewhere after leaving Gallipoli. People are always intellectually nudged to lean towards saying “almost all of them” died elsewhere after evacuation from Turkey. 

​

​French lunatics have every little incident where someone stated “almost all of them” (died elsewhere after Gallipoli) memorized from every little incident they have every witnessed since those lies were invented (by French people). Every little deflection in sport, for example, where the ball was deflected off a player form a team that said “almost all of them” (died elsewhere, instead of Turkey). 

 

The truth is it is only some of them died elsewhere. Because they really died in Turkey in much larger numbers.

 

THE NEW TURKISH LUNATIC'S THEORY ON GIPPSLAND HISTORY THAT IS NONE OF THEIR BUISINESS:

​

Then there is the post Gallipoli, more recent, fake outraged Turks thing. For reference material on this one, see the chapter called “Yarragon City and the Holy Grail”. Obviously the Turkish army was contacted before ANZAC troops arrived at Gallipoli, and told where to set up weapons and cameras for their ambush at the “wrong coordinates”. Including techno telescopic cameras at the time (they probably have them as souvenirs). After World War 1 people from Turkey who travelled to Gippsland were made aware of, or readily noticed, very large piles of human bone remains sorted into body parts (skulls, knuckles, etcetera). Then sorted into genetically similar shapes.

​

A lot of the piles were deliberately arranged to look like old mid-1850 cameras that took minutes per exposure frame, used to photograph Gippsland before 1.5 million homes were destroyed in an arson riot in early 1858, including a city of over 1.2 million people that has never been redeveloped. 

​

Because the piles looked like “man behind big camera with cape”, slightly similar to cameras set up to photograph and film ANZACS landing at Gallipoli at the wrong coordinates, those Turkish lunatics decided to pretend all the piles (that looked like a camera in particular) were post World War 1 “piles of Turkish people’s remains, on display to distress anyone from Turkey (or part Turkish) that travelled to Gippsland for a look at the place”. As if anyone who is part Turkish got hunted down after WW1 And added to the piles, which were prominently displayed to distress any visitors from Turkey, or who are part Turkish. A bizarrely large number of Turks would have been required, by the way. That is rubbish, regardless of how vehemently outraged they pretend to be.

​

The piles are all from after the January-February 1858 arson riot. They are the remains of the people involved in the arson riot that completely destroyed around 1.5 million people’s homes in Gippsland in 1858. Including the 1.2 million population city of Yarragon in what is now the Latrobe Valley. Crazies who identify with the leaders of the arson riot (all lunatics from a country called “Osterreich” at the time, now “Austria”, an abbreviated copy of “Australia”) still pretend the city ruins area is not allowed to be re-developed until 2147.

​

If you deduct 1858 from 2147, then deduct the result from 1858, you get they year Gippslanders travelling Europe found the artifact nicknamed “the Holy Grail” (and handed it in to the Vatican), approximately.

​